🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.