🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.