🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". A law is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a law increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid first step," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the regional level amid federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are no longer content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.